I need an essay written on ONE of any of the following topics – please let me know if you can do this ASAP and which one you will pick:
(1) The trust between a doctor and their patient.
(2) Who are Physician Associates? How will they contribute to improved patient care?
(3) What are the medical challenges of working in a multicultural environment?
(4) The law of diminishing returns: when does the cost of new drugs outweigh their benefits?
(5) How can co-morbidities impact the outcome of COVID-19?
(5) Private medical schools will produce better doctors.
(6) Will increased medical student places solve the problems of the NHS?
(7) The importance of probity and professionalism in medical practice.
(8) COVID-19 – the final pandemic?
(9) Do parents have a moral obligation to vaccinate their children?
The essay should be up to 2,500 words (minimum 2,000 words) excluding references and figures. You are advised to back up any statements that you make with evidence, and references should be properly cited in the text and tabulated in the normal way at the end of the work (Harvard or Vancouver style). You are encouraged to use diagrams where appropriate to illustrate the work. The mark scheme that will be used to assess the essay is attached. References, figures, tables, and legends are not included in the word count.
It needs to be at A+ grade standard as per the attached document – please read this and let me know if you can do this. The deadline would be from 3 days from now
Marking scheme for essays and similar assessments
| Knowledge and understanding | Professional and intellectual skills | Technical skills | |
| Grade A+/A/A- 100 98 95 92 90 88 85 82 80 78 74 | Innovative and original thought Exemplary answer to the question Outstanding knowledge and understanding of the relevant material | Well-formed in response to existing debates, with outstanding criticism of others’ arguments Exemplary integration of wide reading, as appropriate Sure handling of analytical terms and critical concepts Precise, focused argument Exemplary analysis Exemplary discussion of evidence / examples | Superb structure, maintained throughout, that helps to highlight salient points Lucid style and accurate English at an outstanding professional standard Outstanding professional presentation, including referencing and bibliography as appropriate |
| Knowledge and understanding | Professional and intellectual skills | Technical skills | |
| Grade B+/B/B- 72 70 68 65 63 | Independence of thought and/or evidence of originality, especially at the upper range Comprehensive and effective answer to the question Excellent, wide-ranging knowledge and understanding | Well-digested and extensive reading (as appropriate for the task) Sure handling of analytical terms and critical concepts Accurate analysis and effective criticism of others’ arguments Cogent argument, effectively directed to the question Excellent discussion of evidence / examples | Excellent structure Clear writing and accurate English style Professional presentation, including referencing and bibliography as appropriate |
| Knowledge and understanding | Professional and intellectual skills | Technical skills | |
| Grade C+/C/C- 60 58 55 52 50 | Some independence in thought and approach Thorough answer to the question, covering most or all aspects Good to very good knowledge and understanding | Wide reading (as appropriate), generally well-digested Appropriate handling of analytical terms and critical concepts Critical awareness and satisfactory analysis of different points of view Sound argument, generally well-directed to the question Good to very good discussion of evidence / examples | Good to very good structure Generally clear writing and acceptable English style Good to very good presentation, including referencing and bibliography as appropriate |
| Knowledge and understanding | Professional and intellectual skills | Technical skills | |
| GradeD48 46 45 | Adequate to good answer to the question, covering the main aspects Adequate to good knowledge and understanding Typical weaknesses in this classinclude over-reliance on one or twoauthorities; some irrelevance; someincoherenceinargumentand/orstructure | Fair amount of reading Some awareness of different points of view, maybe with some deficiencies in analysis and characterisation Serious attempt to make appropriate use of analytical terms and critical concepts, maybe with some deficiencies Adequate and generally relevant argument Some discussion of evidence / examples | Generally coherent structure Some deficiencies in clarity and English style, but generally adequate to good Moderate presentation, including referencing and bibliography as appropriate |
| Knowledge and understanding | Professional and intellectual skills | Technical skills | |
| Grade E 44– 0 | Could scarcely be considered a serious attempt at the task Failure to address the question adequately Little evidence of knowledge and/or understanding Typically brief and/or incomplete | Little or no evidence of relevant reading Little or no discernible argument Some demonstrable ability to communicate information about relevant material | Little or no discernible structure Widespread incoherence and/or irrelevance Minimal acceptable level of fluency and technical competence; comprehensible overall even if characterized by errors in grammar and/or vocabulary Poor or very poor presentation, with poor, incomplete or no referencing and bibliography |