1. Does your peer meet the clear and professional communication standards set for this project? What specific choices show that they meet this objective? What is one change that could make it even stronger?
2. Does your peer show awareness of their audience by anticipating how the recipient might respond? Explain your reasoning with an example.
3. Rate the neatness of your peer’s email or letter on a scale of 1-3. Kindly explain your rating.
4. Are their complaints or requests framed in a way that encourages action? Explain your reasoning with an example.
5. Does your peer go beyond the basic scenario, or do they only repeat exactly what was provided? Give examples of where they added extra detail, thought, or professionalism. If not, suggest two ways they could have shown more creativity.
6. Does your peer follow the email or letter format outlined in the instructions? Give examples of how they do or do not. Offer your peer encouraging words in either case.
7. Do you notice any signs your peer may have used AI in their work? If so, how effectively did they use it? Do you feel that they used it as a support tool or as a replacement for their own writing? Explain your reasoning. Offer tips for how they could use AI effectively (e.g., to catch proofreading or grammar errors) or more responsibly.

This assignment has two steps. 

Step1:

You have read the English Only in California article carefully  and write a well-develop extended summary paragraph.  

To write summary take the following steps:

1. Read the article closely 
2. Finding the main ideas and supporting ideas 
3. Briefly write down those ideas in a paragraph format
4. Be Sure to use your own words
5. Read the summary aloud and correct any mistakes

Then, express your opinion in 3 to 5 sentences. Post your ideas by clicking on the “Reply” button at the bottom of this page by Wednesday, June 24th at 11:59pm. (You will see your classmates’ replies after you submit your post.)

This assignment has two steps. 

Step1:

You have read the English Only in California article carefully  and write a well-develop extended summary paragraph.  

To write summary take the following steps:

1. Read the article closely 
2. Finding the main ideas and supporting ideas 
3. Briefly write down those ideas in a paragraph format
4. Be Sure to use your own words
5. Read the summary aloud and correct any mistakes

Then, express your opinion in 3 to 5 sentences. Post your ideas by clicking on the “Reply” button at the bottom of this page by Wednesday, June 24th at 11:59pm. (You will see your classmates’ replies after you submit your post.)

1. Does your peer meet the clear and professional communication standards set for this project? What specific choices show that they meet this objective? What is one change that could make it even stronger?
2. Does your peer show awareness of their audience by anticipating how the recipient might respond? Explain your reasoning with an example.
3. Rate the neatness of your peer’s email or letter on a scale of 1-3. Kindly explain your rating.
4. Are their complaints or requests framed in a way that encourages action? Explain your reasoning with an example.
5. Does your peer go beyond the basic scenario, or do they only repeat exactly what was provided? Give examples of where they added extra detail, thought, or professionalism. If not, suggest two ways they could have shown more creativity.
6. Does your peer follow the email or letter format outlined in the instructions? Give examples of how they do or do not. Offer your peer encouraging words in either case.
7. Do you notice any signs your peer may have used AI in their work? If so, how effectively did they use it? Do you feel that they used it as a support tool or as a replacement for their own writing? Explain your reasoning. Offer tips for how they could use AI effectively (e.g., to catch proofreading or grammar errors) or more responsibly.